Star Trek Series

Make yourself at home: this forum is for visitors and officers who enjoy humour and actuality, you are allowed to speak about anything here within reason.

Moderators: Starfleet Security, Federation Council

Post Reply
EVOXSNES
Commander
Commander
Posts: 2086
Joined: July 2nd, 2011, 11:03 am
STO Handle: sulla@evoxsnes
Location: La Trobe Valley, Australia.
Contact:

Star Trek Series

Post by EVOXSNES »

I suggest that everyone who hasnt seen this article, that is interested in a new Star Trek series.

Give this article a good read. It answers a lot of questions.


http://airlockalpha.com/node/9222/is-th ... uture.html
Image
Image
Bailo
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 385
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 11:57 am
STO Handle: @Bailo
Location: Wiltshire, United Kingdom

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Bailo »

An interesting read for sure! I cannot say i would be particularly happy if they decided to carry the series on from the JJ Abrams movie. However i did groan when they spoke of making Enterprise. A prequel to Kirk's Enterprise i felt wasn't getting us anywhere. Although now, after i gave Enterprise a chance it's really grown on me and i thoroughly enjoy watching it now. So who knows. Personally however i would like to see them continue from where Voyager and Nemesis left off, maybe 10-50 years later. I think this would be the best course of action because the interviews with Nemesis state that they thought it tied up all the loose ends. I disagree wholeheartedly. Yes B4 ended up whistling the tune to "Blue Skies", but what happened to him is he still active? Is he Data again? Not to mention the fate of the crew of Voyager, Deep Space Nine and the Enterprise- E.

I'm not expecting whole episodes dedicated to the subject, but a brief mention in one episode somewhere that B-4 is not Data but has all his memories and can now walk and talk like a normal android, But decided to join Starfleet Corps of Engineer's where he is currently working on creating androids improving upon his design of Lal. Or that the Enterprise-E was destroyed in a severe ion storm while mapping the Deltic Expanse with all hands, bar Jean-Luc who was on shoreleave at the time Or Sisko was promoted to Admiral at some point and died peacefully in his sleep one Saturday afternoon and that Janeway still had some Borg nanoprobes in her bloodstream from one of her previous encounters that were resistant to medication or whatever and sat dormant for 50 years before assimilating her and she unfortunately had to be vaporized by a security Ensign as she tried destroying McKinley Station, after successfully sending a message to the Borg, in an all but futile effort to cripple the Federation. Don't even get me started on Troi, Riker and the Titan...

I love Star Trek and despite my previous misgiving about Enterprise, i have come to love it. But in all seriousness...I've had quite enough of prequels and alternate universes. Lets just continue the story PLEASE!!
Image
Image
"I have a sheep doing roofing over at my house, come and drop in. We'll put on Zeppelin and eat cheddar cheese" - Captain Jean-Luc Picard
Alexraptor
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 607
Joined: May 26th, 2011, 6:44 pm
STO Handle: @Alexraptor
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Alexraptor »

Agreed, its completely illogical to try to mess around in the past.
By moving the story ahead writers would be given A LOT more freedom of what they can do, and be able to write their own story without pissing off the fanbase.
They would not be restrained canonicly of what is to come, and able to have events unfold as however they see fit.
Image
Shroombuck
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2380
Joined: May 23rd, 2011, 11:10 am

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Shroombuck »

I hate these 'back-in-the-past' Star Trek fuck-ups.
Image
Image
Jesse
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 777
Joined: May 21st, 2011, 5:58 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Jesse »

Startrek Enterprise being set before TOS..... It's like making a prequel to Top Gear that reviews horses and carriages. Totally the wrong direction. Frustrating even. That's because people really like the futuristic element of trek, and devolving to "polarised plating" is a slap in the face. How can they not grasp this very basic concept?

Any way what is really important is to have a series that focuses on writing good stories again. That is what trek is all about.
Image
Kelbie
Senior Captain
Senior Captain
Posts: 1137
Joined: June 16th, 2011, 11:50 pm
STO Handle: @Charlie25
Location: Scotland, Tayside

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Kelbie »

If they even attempt to go back in the past again? I will not bother watching it because it will likely to be cancelled half way mid seasons. They need to focus on the future, like 10 years after Nemesis.


People these days just do prequels to get easy money.
Image
Image
Picard
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 1863
Joined: May 20th, 2011, 11:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Picard »

Enterprise had potential, only the cast and writers were shit. The crew seems like a bunch of red neck. It's hard to imagine that even after their third world war this was the best humanity had to offer. Sometimes the things they say makes me wonder if the series was not aimed at the Desperate Housewife audience. TNG was well written and the cast was exceptional, exactly the opposite of Enterprise.
Thank you,
Image
Image
Shroombuck
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 2380
Joined: May 23rd, 2011, 11:10 am

Re: Star Trek Series

Post by Shroombuck »

Picard wrote:Enterprise had potential, only the cast and writers were shit. The crew seems like a bunch of red neck. It's hard to imagine that even after their third world war this was the best humanity had to offer. Sometimes the things they say makes me wonder if the series was not aimed at the Desperate Housewife audience. TNG was well written and the cast was exceptional, exactly the opposite of Enterprise.
It didn't have potential. It does only have potential when it employs cast from the Glorious British Empire. The Colonies... pehff... fucknuts.
Image
Image
Post Reply