Page 2 of 2

Re: Security ?

Posted: July 5th, 2011, 7:57 pm
by Zion
So what's the rules of engagement for heretics and destroyed empty husks (probably not right to hard to quote on my mobile)

Re: Security ?

Posted: July 5th, 2011, 9:22 pm
by Carbonizer
So that means I can argue to the point that my holy and epic banners MUST be pulled down ?

Edit: Nevermind, seems Jesse already (basically) pointed that out in a recent announcement

Re: Security ?

Posted: July 5th, 2011, 9:47 pm
by TParis
Shroombuck wrote:Mwa, a skilled legal professional could invalidate it, regardless; it would be a waste of resources to begin with in my opinion.
There would be nearly zero legal support for a case such as this. Jesse and my work can be considered pro-bono work on behalf of UFP which means UFP owns the copyright. That said, UFP doesnt neccessarily exist as a true organization or a legal entity so perhaps there is something.

The real value is any copyright lawsuit is that UFP doesn't have the funds or resources to fight it so it would likily result in a simply cease and desist order at the least.

Re: Security ?

Posted: July 5th, 2011, 10:39 pm
by Shroombuck
TParis wrote:
Shroombuck wrote:Mwa, a skilled legal professional could invalidate it, regardless; it would be a waste of resources to begin with in my opinion.
There would be nearly zero legal support for a case such as this. Jesse and my work can be considered pro-bono work on behalf of UFP which means UFP owns the copyright. That said, UFP doesnt neccessarily exist as a true organization or a legal entity so perhaps there is something.

The real value is any copyright lawsuit is that UFP doesn't have the funds or resources to fight it so it would likily result in a simply cease and desist order at the least.
That's right, hence my comment.

Re: Security ?

Posted: July 8th, 2011, 11:33 am
by Wh1skers
Oh Delta. How disappointed I am.